You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of women stratified by gestational weight gain categorya

From: Elevated lipid oxidation is associated with exceeding gestational weight gain recommendations and increased neonatal anthropometrics: a cross-sectional analysis

Participants, N=32 Inadequate (n=7)Mean ± SD Adequate (n=14)Mean ± SD Excess (n=11)Mean ± SD p-value
Gestational Weight Gain (kilograms)* 8.5±2.01 13.3±1.3 18.8±2.3†‡ <0.001*
Pre-pregnancy BMI* 21.2±1.5 22.0±1.7 23.0±1.5‡ 0.035*
Age (years) 26.7±6.6 31.6±3.8 29.8±3.7 0.082
Gestation Age at Study Visit (weeks) 34.5±2.7 34.5±1.7 34.3±1.6 0.977
Gestation Age at Delivery (weeks) 40.6±1.2 39.7±1.1 39.3±1.2 0.079
Percent Body Fat at Study Visit (%)b* 19.4±5.1 19.4±3.4 23.2±3.2†‡ 0.033*
Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)* 112.4±11.2 116.3±13.3 117.8±14.6 0.705
Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) 69.1±7.8 70.9±13.0 74.3±8.0 0.564
Parityc n (%) n (%) n (%) 0.201
    Primiparous 6 (86%) 7 (50%) 5 (55%)
    Multiparous 13 (14%) 7 (50%) 6 (45%)
Ethnicityc n (%) n (%) n (%) 0.515
    Caucasian 9 (100%) 13 (93%) 11 (100%)
     Hispanic 0   (0%) 1  (7%) 0  (0%)
Educationc n (%) n (%) n (%) 0.147
    High School Graduate 2 (29%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
    Trade School 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (9%)
    College Graduate 2 (29%) 6 (43%) 4 (36%)
    Post- Graduate Degree 3 (42%) 8 (57%) 6 (55%)
Cholesterol (mg/dL) 290.2±48.7 257.4±40.8 255.6±28.5 0.176
LDL (mg/dL)b 184.2±48.5 145.8±39.2 135.5±35.2 0.064
HDL (mg/dL) 61.1±19.4 76.8±22.2 71.4±23.3 0.365
Triglycerides (mg/dL) 225.2±78.3 173.8±50.7 231.5±85.4 0.107
Free Fatty Acids(meq/L) 0.48±0.12 0.38±0.14 0.42±0.13 0.283
Insulin (uU/mL) 9.5±4.9 9.3±4.6 8.8±3.4 0.943
Glucose (mg/dL) 77.5±7.4 81.7±6.1 80.5±8.3 0.496
HOMA-IR 1.8±1.0 1.9±1.0 1.8±0.8 0.967
  1. a Groups were compared using ANOVA with post-hoc analyses, unless specifically noted
  2. b Groups compared using Kruskal-Wallis tests
  3. cGroups compared using chi-square analysis
  4. *Significant difference between groups (main effect), p<0.05
  5. †Excess GWG group was significantly different from adequate GWG, p<0.05
  6. ‡ Excess GWG group was significantly different from inadequate GWG, p<0.05